Forages and Pastures: Grazing and Forage Management

نویسندگان

  • J. B. Hall
  • B. R. Johnson
  • R. H. Stokes
  • R. Ambrosek
  • K. Coffey
  • J. Jennings
  • C. West
  • A. Young
  • T. Hess
  • M. Savin
  • C. Rosenkrans
  • K. P. Coffey
  • A. N. Young
  • C. P. West
  • G. F. Erf
  • C. F. Rosenkrans
چکیده

The objective of this study was to compare summer annuals for fall and winter grazing on irrigated pastures in the Intermountain West. The cool desert areas of this region have short growing seasons (≤120 d) with high daytime temperatures and cool nights resulting in sufficent growing degree days, but impaired production on cool season forages during late summer. Five species were planted in Carmen, ID (45°17′N, 113°53′W; 1155 m elevation) in 0.10 ha plots with 3 plot replicates per species. Four species were planted in yr 1 and 2: CORN (Zea mays), sorghum x sudangrass (Sorghum spp; SUDEX), TEFF (Eragrostis tef), and GERMAN foxtail (Setaria italica). PEARL millet (Pennisetum glaucum) planted in yr 1 was replaced by PROSO millet (Panicum miliaceum) in yr 2. All species except TEFF were planted no-till from June 25 to July 2. TEFF was planted after minimum tillage. Three 1/1000 ha yield samples were taken from each plot. Pooled samples for each species were analyzed for CP, ADF, NDF, Ca and P. TEFF was sampled at 50 d post planting (haying) with all species sampled after killing frost (September 8 and 16, yr 1 and 2, respectively). Heifers grazed the plots during November and December, and animal grazing days were recorded. Yield data were analyzed by ANOVA with means compared using a t-test. Data for each yr were analyzed separately. Species affected DM yield (P = 0.10 yr 1; P < 0.02 yr 2). Yields (DM; Mg ha−1) were not different (P = 0.22) for CORN (5.5 ± 1.6, 10.7 ± 1.0), GERMAN (5.4 ± 0.4, 5.8 ± 1.0), and SUDEX (7.0 ± 0.7, 7.1 ± 1.8) in yr 1 and 2, respectively, and TEFF (6.1 ± 0.2; yr 1 only). In yr 1, yields of SUDEX and TEFF exceeded (P < 0.01) PEARL (3.9 ± 1.2 Mg ha−1). CORN yields were greater (P < 0.01) than GERMAN or PROSO (3.9 ± 1.6 Mg ha−1) in yr 2. Nutrient content of all forages exceeded NRC requirements for cows in mid-gestation. TEFF, PROSO, and PEARL produced fewer (P = 0.10) animal grazing days than the other species. In conclusion, CORN, SUDEX, and GERMAN produce acceptable fall and winter grazing for the Intermountain West.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mineral Concentrations of Annual Cool Season Pasture Forages in North Florida during the Winter-Spring Grazing Season: II. Trace Minerals

Concentrations of selected trace minerals (Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, Co, Se) were determined from annual cool-season grass pasture forages over four consecutive winter-spring grazing seasons (2001-2005). Twice monthly forage samples were taken from eight experimental pastures used in beef cattle grazing trials. Two, 2-yr experiments were conducted; animal and pasture data were reported previously. Each e...

متن کامل

Relationships Among Forage and Litter Production in Three Grazing Intensities in Nodooshan Rangeland (Yazd, Iran)

Grazing management plays an important role in the continuous and economicutilization of pastures. Proper grazing management is a main factor for the accumulation ofplant litter which reduces soil erosion and increase the soil permeability to keep moremoisture in the soil. In current study, the effect of three different grazing intensities (low,moderate and high) along with the grazing gradient ...

متن کامل

Mineral Concentrations of Cool-Season Pasture Forages in North Florida during the Winter-Spring Grazing Season: I. Macro Minerals

Concentrations of selected macro minerals (Ca, P, Na, K, and Mg) were determined from coolseason annual grass pasture forages over four consecutive late fall-winter-spring grazing seasons (2001-2005). Forage samples were taken from eight experimental pastures used in beef cattle grazing trials. Two, 2-yr experiments were conducted; animal and pasture data were reported previously (Myer and Blou...

متن کامل

ASAS Centennial Paper: utilization of pasture and forages by ruminants: a historical perspective.

Pastures, forages, and grasslands dominate the landscape across the United States and support a large ruminant population that supplies the nation with value-added animal products. A historical perspective is presented of the innovations as they occurred in the Journal of Animal Science over the past 100 yr in pasture and forage research. Consideration was given to both animal and pasture persp...

متن کامل

Heifer Production on Rangeland and Seeded Forages in the Northern Great Plains

Integrating use of seeded perennial cool-season grass pastures with native rangeland can increase available forage and provide a high plane of nutrition for grazing livestock. Our objective was to compare performance of yearling beef heifers grazing native rangeland with those grazing an integrated system that included seeded forages. Twice-replicated, 3-ha pastures seeded to either ‘Rosana’ we...

متن کامل

Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems.

Fermentation in the rumen of cattle produces methane (CH4). Methane may play a role in global warming scenarios. The linking of grazing management strategies to more efficient beef production while reducing the CH4 emitted by beef cattle is important. The sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique was used to determine the effects of best management practices (BMP) grazing compared with continu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010